I’ve been referring to solar farms as wing-toasters and wind farms as slice-and-dicers for some time.
Found a few articles that explain why wind turbines have earned that well-deserved title:
4/30 The ECOreport – How Much Wildlife Can USA Afford to Kill? – Lots of footnotes.
Don’t go to the link unless you can stomach photos of large raptors sliced into pieces. Staff at wind farms are picking up chunks. One eagle was beheaded.
Amongst many points in the article are that all the counts of mortality are severely understated. Two specific reasons are an intentionally small search area and infrequent counts:
Wildlife expert Jim Wiegand has documented how areas searched under wind turbines are still confined to 200-foot radiuses, even though modern monster turbines catapult 90% of bird and bat carcasses much further. Windfarm owners, operating under voluntary(!) USFWS guidelines, commission studies that search much-too-small areas, look only once every 30-90 days, ensuring that scavengers remove most carcasses, and ignore wounded birds that happen to be found within search perimeters.
In the accounting world, we call that “auditing with your eyes closed.”
In the slice-and-dice world, that shows up as avoiding the birds disposed by scavengers and skipping the birds that don’t fall straight down when hit by a turbine moving over a hundred miles an hour. Blades are in the range of 100 feet long so a radius of 200 feet is twice the reach of blades – birds would have to fall almost straight down to get counted.
That would be like calculating a baseball player’s batting average by counting the number of hit balls landing on the infield. But only in every third inning.
Save the Eagles International – Article mentioned above was written by the president of Save the Eagles.
WARNING! You don’t want to visit their site unless you can tolerate photos of eagles in pieces, which demonstrate what happens when a bird meets the blade of a slice-and-dicer.