## Inventory and accuracy of Soviet nuclear weapons in 1990.

In my research on nuclear armaments came across a superb resource:** Physics and Nuclear Arms Today (Readings from Physics Today)**

(**Update** 4/2/20: Title of post revised.)

The book has lots of articles from the early 1980s through 1991. I bought the book especially for one specific article in 1983 dealing with US and Soviet nuclear forces. The gold mine in that article was a detailed inventory of strategic weaponry as of 1990. It gives a detailed listing of U.S. and Soviet land, submarine, and air based strategic weapons, including count, yield, equivalent megaton, and circular error probable (CEP). Lots of info I’ve been seeking for a long time.

The previous post gave info on US weapons. This post describes the Soviet inventory. Third post will make some comparisons.

First I’ll give my recap of the info and then do a little analysis. Width limits on web pages mean there will be multiple tables.

** **

A few notes on the columns. Yields are listed in megatons. CEP is circular error probable, or the average accuracy of a weapon. CEP is the distance at which 50% of the weapons would hit closer and 50% would hit further away.

A one megaton weapon is not ten times more powerful than a 100 kiloton weapon. To compare the destructive power a factor called * equivalent megaton* is used. The article and table explained this, which is brand new information to me. The equivalent megaton (EMT) is calculated using a formula: yield in megatons raised to the two-thirds power, or y^(2/3).

For example, a 550 kt SS-25 has .67 EMT. A 100 kt SS-24 has .22 EMT. The SS-25 has rated power 5.5 times higher but is actually only 3.0 times more powerful.

** **

This is the number and power of different Soviet weapons. The number of launchers is listed along with yield and equivalent megaton. The total MT and EMT is then calculated.

launcher | yield | equiv mt | total mt | total Equiv mt | |

SS-11 assume all mod 3 | 400 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 400 | 400 |

SS-13 | 60 | 0.600 | 0.71 | 36 | 43 |

SS-17 mod 3 | 138 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 276 | 348 |

SS-18 assume all mod 4 | 308 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 1,540 | 1,940 |

SS-19 Mod 3 | 350 | 0.550 | 0.67 | 1,155 | 1,410 |

SS-24 | 30 | 0.100 | 0.22 | 30 | 65 |

SS-25 | 165 | 0.550 | 0.67 | 91 | 111 |

—- | —- | —- | |||

total land based | 1,451 | 3,528 | 4,316 | ||

.. | |||||

SS-N-5 | 18 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 18 | 18 |

SS-N-6 mod 1 | 120 | 0.750 | 0.83 | 90 | 99 |

SS-N-6 mod 2 | 120 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 120 | 151 |

SS-N-8 mod 2 | 286 | 0.800 | 0.86 | 229 | 246 |

SS-N-17 | 12 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 6 | 8 |

SS-N-18 mod 1 | 74 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 111 | 140 |

SS-N-18 mod 2 | 75 | 0.750 | 0.83 | 56 | 62 |

SS-N-18 mod 3 | 74 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 185 | 233 |

SS-N-20 | 100 | 0.100 | 0.22 | 60 | 129 |

SS-N-23 | 80 | 0.100 | 0.22 | 80 | 172 |

—- | —- | —- | |||

total sea based | 959 | 955 | 1,259 | ||

.. | |||||

TU-95 Bear | – | – | – | ||

Bombs (2 or 3, assume 2.5 ave) | 40 | 1.000 | 1.00 | 100 | 100 |

AS-3 ALCM (1 or 2 assume 1.5) | 60 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 45 | 57 |

AS-15 ALCM | 75 | 0.500 | 0.63 | 300 | 378 |

(complete WAG on yields) | |||||

—- | —- | —- | |||

total bomber based | 175 | 445 | 535 | ||

—- | —- | —- | |||

total of above | 2,585 | 4,928 | 6,109 |

For those weapon systems, here is the number of launchers, warheads per launcher, and total warheads for the weapon class. The CEP in meters is listed. Last column is the likelihood of destroying a missile silo hardened to 2,000 pounds per square inch. The options there are **no**, **yes**, **4 m** (site would not only be destroyed but also under at least 4 meters of dirt), and **um, no** (CEP of 13 *kilometers* would not only miss the target silo, it would likely miss the *squadron*).

launcher | warhead | total warhead | CEP (m) | 2000 psi | |

SS-11 assume all mod 3 | 400 | 1 | 400 | 1,100 | no |

SS-13 | 60 | 1 | 60 | 1,800 | no |

SS-17 mod 3 | 138 | 4 | 552 | 400 | yes |

SS-18 assume all mod 4 | 308 | 10 | 3,080 | 250 | 4 m |

SS-19 Mod 3 | 350 | 6 | 2,100 | 300 | 4 m |

SS-24 | 30 | 10 | 300 | 200 | yes |

SS-25 | 165 | 1 | 165 | 200 | 4 m |

—- | —- | ||||

total land based | 1,451 | 6,657 | |||

. | |||||

SS-N-5 | 18 | 1 | 18 | 2,800 | no |

SS-N-6 mod 1 | 120 | 1 | 120 | 1,300 | no |

SS-N-6 mod 2 | 120 | 2 | 240 | 13,000 | um, no |

SS-N-8 mod 2 | 286 | 1 | 286 | 900 | no |

SS-N-17 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 1,400 | no |

SS-N-18 mod 1 | 74 | 3 | 222 | 1,400 | no |

SS-N-18 mod 2 | 75 | 1 | 75 | 900 | no |

SS-N-18 mod 3 | 74 | 5 | 370 | 900 | no |

SS-N-20 | 100 | 6 | 600 | 500 | no |

SS-N-23 | 80 | 10 | 800 | 800 | no |

—- | —- | ||||

total sea based | 959 | 2,743 | |||

. | |||||

TU-95 Bear | – | ||||

Bombs (2 or 3, assume 2.5 ave) | 40 | 3 | 100 | ||

AS-3 ALCM (1 or 2 assume 1.5) | 60 | 2 | 90 | ||

AS-15 ALCM | 75 | 8 | 600 | ||

(complete WAG on yields) | |||||

—- | —- | ||||

total bomber based | 175 | 790 | |||

—- | —- | ||||

total of above | 2,585 | 10,190 |

I made a number of assumptions to develop the above tables.